The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Identify, communicate and consult with key stakeholders
|
|
The identification by cultural authorities of appropriate persons within communities who hold cultural knowledge relevant to determining the cultural significance of Aboriginal places and heritage is applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication and consultation methodologies that place Aboriginal cultural protocols and values at the forefront and accommodate stakeholder concerns and interests are developed and implemented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Traditional ownership of Aboriginal sites, cultural material, and objects is confirmed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Approval is obtained from relevant Traditional Owners and Cultural managers for work to be carried out and for access to the Aboriginal site for the specific persons who will conduct work Completed |
Evidence:
|
Working relationships with key stakeholders that assist in the management of culturally significant places are developed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Client needs for deliverables required in a formal Sites survey report are scoped and documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research on the Burra Charter process and on other existing industry guidelines to ensure proper processes are planned for is undertaken and applied to assessment processes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Collect initial site data
|
|
Site plans and maps are sourced and verified including topographical maps Completed |
Evidence:
|
Required resources are identified and acquired Completed |
Evidence:
|
A base plan of the site is prepared Completed |
Evidence:
|
Site orientation is undertaken and location, geographic and operational boundaries are defined and verified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Current land use and environmental problems and threats are identified and recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Covenants that could affect the site or report are identified and recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Climate and weather conditions are ascertained from historical data Completed |
Evidence:
|
Compile a site inventory
|
|
Site context, location and site informationdata is categorised and recorded accurately Completed |
Evidence:
|
Features data is categorised and recorded accurately Completed |
Evidence:
|
Cultural material, objects, properties and relevant physical characteristics are identified and recorded on site inventory Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant field research is undertaken Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate techniques and tools and relevant archaeological practices and procedures are implemented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Structural elements are located and existing services and facilities confirmed Completed |
Evidence:
|
The presence, location and/or extent of other relevant site constraints are recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Limits of acceptable change in the forms of deterioration and damage to the places of cultural significance are developed to legislative and enterprise requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review, assess and record the site data
|
|
Engagement of relevant expertise and consultant services are obtained when required Completed |
Evidence:
|
An assessment of cultural significance is conducted Completed |
Evidence:
|
A statement of cultural significance is documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine the impact of threats to the site
|
|
Threats to culturally significant places, both external and internal to the area under consideration, are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
A risk assessment of all threats to determine potential impact on sites and associated cultural landscape is undertaken Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk management strategies and protection/conservation measures to control risks are developed and implemented Completed |
Evidence:
|
A risk management report that incorporates an impact analysis is developed and documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Policy changes required to address the threats are documented to enterprise requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document a site survey report
|
|
Site information is documented into a site assessment report or site survey report Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assessment report incorporates all relevant data from the site assessment in line with client needs and the requirements of relevant legislation and regulations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Specific recommendations for remedial action of site conservation and mitigation of site problems are provided and recorded as appropriate Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommendations for appropriate risk controls of site hazards are formulated and documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Survey and assessment data are stored and maintained as part of professional practice Completed |
Evidence:
|
Client-stakeholder is informed and advised of the content and implications of the report and a copy is presented Completed |
Evidence:
|